China Change, published: May 5, 2014
Update (7:00 am, Eastern Time, May 6): Five are criminally detained for “creating disturbances (寻衅滋事), and they are: Xu Youyu, Hao Jian, Liu Di, Hu Shigen and Pu Zhiqiang.
As the 25th anniversary of Tian’anmen Democracy Movement approaches, a small group of people, consisted of Tiananmen mothers, scholars, dissidents, writers, held a seminar in Beijing on May 3rd to remember the event, discuss its impact and consequences, and call for truth finding and resolution of remaining issues. Less than two days after the seminar, multiple disappearances have been reported.
The attendees were:
From left to right: back — Hao Jian, Cui Weiping, Liu Di, Liang Xiaoyan, Hu Shigen, Li Xuewen, and Guo Yuhua;
front — Zhou Fan, Xu Youyu, Zhang Xianling, Qin Hui, Ye Fu, and Pu Zhiqiang.
Cui Weiping （崔卫平，professor at Beijing Film Academy）, Guo Yuhua (郭于华, sociology professor at Tsinghua University), Hao Jian (郝建, professor at Beijing Film Academy), Hu Shigen (胡石根, dissident, former political prisoner and former lecturer at Beijing Language and Culture University), Li Xuewen (黎学文，independent scholar and writer), Liang Xiaoyan (梁晓燕，Tiananmen participant, former college teacher and currently NGO leader)， Liu Di （刘荻, dissident writer, imprisoned for over a year for her online expressions in 2002）, Pu Zhiqiang (浦志强, rights lawyer), Qin Hui (秦晖, historian at Tsinghua University), Wang Dongcheng (王东成, professor at China Youth University for Political Sciences), Wu Wei (吴伟, independent scholar and former official in Zhao Zhiyang’s time in 1980s), Xu Youyu (徐友渔, researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences), Ye Fu (野夫, independent writer), Zhang Xianling (张先玲, Tiananmen mother), Zhou Feng (周枫, associate professor at China Youth University for Political Sciences). Four people couldn’t make it but sent written comments: Chen Ziming (陈子明, dissident scholar), He Weifang (贺卫方, legal scholar at Peking University), Murong Xuecun (慕容雪村, independent writer) and Wang Xiaoshan (王小山, independent commentator).
The seminar, held right under the authorities’ nose as an activist puts it, is considered by many an audacious act as the Chinese government is clearly nervous about the approaching anniversary, and more so this year.
Pu Zhiqiang in 1989, a student at China University of Law and Political Science.
At 4 am on Monday, Beijing time, police took rights lawyer Pu Zhiqiang away from home. And in the afternoon between 2 to 4, police raided his home in Beijing, taking away books, laptops and cell phones.
Hao Jian has been out of reach since Sunday, and his home is reported to have been raided too on Monday.
In addition, at least Hu Shigen, Liu Di and Xu Youyu, who was taken away by police around 5 pm, Monday, are still out of reach so far.
Cui Weiping, Guo Yuhua, Qin Hui, and Wang Xiaoshan were questioned by police and have since been released, according to information available on social media.
A source told China Change that Liang Xiaoyan has been taken on a forced “trip” out of Beijing.
The same source also told China Change that the Chinese security police had been calling the attendees prior to the seminar likely in an attempt to stop the meeting, but none answered the phone.
The Beijing-based independent journalist Gao Yu has been disappeared since April 24. She was due to attend a June 4th-related event in Hong Kong.
According to Teng Biao, Yao Jianfu (姚监复), another independent scholar and a close friend of Gao Yu, is also missing.
May 4th, 1989, Tiananmen Square, Beijing.
Over the recent days, there have been reports that dissidents and activists are being “shang-gang” (上岗) – placed under house arrest — ahead of the Tian’anmen anniversary, including Mo Zhixu (莫之许) in Beijing and Ye Du (野渡) in Guangzhou. The number of those put under such arbitrary detention can be big over the next month or so.
During the seminar, attendees said that, while people may have different views about the June 4th movement, one thing is for certain: it is not a riot and nothing justifies opening fire on unarmed citizens.
Some attendees expressed their views that the June 4th military crackdown sowed seeds for today’s social ills in China. While power abuses, mistreatment of ordinary people, tolerance of corruption, and disregard for justice are inherent in China’s political system, they have become rampant and uncontrollable since the June 4th crackdown.
The attendees emphasized that there is no need to ask the authorities to clear name for the June 4th movement, for people are the judges of right and wrong, not the authorities. What they ask the Party to do, and what they themselves are doing, is to find and restore the truth and build fairness and justice through a political transition.
Chinese people should be more objective towards the 1989 Tiananmen Square event. People cannot objectively understand the issue of human rights without comparison. The following is the brief content of a new book titled ‘Tiananmen Square “Massacre”? The Power of Words vs. Silent Evidence’: http://www.amazon.com/Tiananmen-Massacre-Evidence-Disinformation-Humanity/dp/1494326590
The so-called Tiananmen Square “Massacre” is one of the most misleading events the US government and the Western media have used to demonize the Chinese government each and every year since 1989. There was ample silent evidence in the images produced by the Western media that told the story of a highly restrained and caring Chinese government facing a protest similar to those in the West at various stages of their economic development. However, the West and anti-communist forces had capitalized on the situation in 1989 to fuel the public’s anger, intending to overthrow a good government. How the Western media lied about a massacre given the silent evidence that suggests otherwise, and the moral implications of Western powers making use of common pain and dissatisfaction within an economic cycle of a society to justify the overthrowing of governments across the globe are issues that this book is structured to explore.
The concept of good governance, human rights and freedom is a complex one. Incidents of government crackdowns on protesters are as frequent in the West as anywhere else. The only difference is that the West has a highly sophisticated, well-funded, well-established and well-controlled media industry run by a handful of big corporations with an agenda. Without their agenda-based support, victims of government oppression in the West will hardly ever be noticed by the wider Western community and the world.
To prove such a point, I have included in my analysis the history of protest management in the US and the creative techniques used by the US authorities against the Occupy Wall Street protesters.
One should always bear in mind that the concepts of good governance, human rights and freedom can only be objectively assessed through the power of comparison. The truth can only be found through filtering the indoctrinated messages propagated by the mainstream media. It is important for one to always think for themselves, and to observe the logic and images beyond the media rhetoric.
I hope this anti-China website will not delete this posting.
“I hope this anti-China website will not delete this posting”
How do you know this is an ‘anti-China’ website? Surely it’s more plausible to describe this as a ‘pro-China’ website since it is run by a Chinese person with the aim of promoting reforms she believes to be beneficial for China.
So your argument is that if only CCTV had better funding and management, China could finally have an open discussion about this in the same way as the rest of the world does following incidents of state violence against peaceful protesters? The logic is flawed. There is a difference between big media in the west demonizing the Occupy Wall Street protesters and big media in China stifling all discussion of similar events here. I’m sure you are well aware the Chinese constitution guarantees similar rights to free speech, rights which the highly sophisticated, well-funded, well-established and well-controlled media industry run by a single ‘corporation’ is now removing wholesale. The difference in your example is simply that people know about Occupy Wall Street and enjoy the freedom to have an opinion and speak about it.
This website is not anti-China, you are making the mistake of equating a country and its government. In lieu of a similar space in China, this website is simply a place to have a discussion arbitrarily and illegally banned in China. I doubt your post will be deleted, your opinion is welcome here, but your logic is utterly flawed.
[…] Change has posted a list of attendees at Saturday’s seminar, and of those who have subsequently faced questioning or detention. Last week, The […]
[…] As the 25th anniversary of Tian’anmen Democracy Movement approaches, a small group of people, cons… Among them, lawyer Pu Zhiqiang 浦志强 was detained under the crime of “disrupting social order”. The following is my translation of a 2012 article published by Nanfang Weekly (in Chinese) about Lawyer Pu Zhiqiang. […]
[…] On May 3, nearly 20 Tiananmen activists and scholars held a private seminar in Beijing; on May 5, five attendees were detained by the authorities. Since criminal detention can legally last up to 30 days, this ensures that those arrested will be […]
[…] was rounded up after the May 3 seminar, human rights website ChinaChange.org reported, along with Beijing Film Academy professor Hao Jian, who has also taught at Harvard University, […]
[…] Scholars and Lawyer Disappeared after June 4th Seminar in Beijing […]
[…] of Social Sciences, and Hao Jian, a professor at the Beijing Film Academy. The pair had attended a meeting on May 3 with lawyers, writers, and other scholars to discuss the 1989 protests and subsequent crackdown by […]
[…] early this month, together with several other highly respectable intellectuals, Prof Xu was “criminally detained” by the Chinese authorities for holding a private workshop in the memory of the Tiananmen Tragedy […]
[…] in a Beijing apartment, which Murong missed because he was out of the country, resulted in the detention of several prominent intellectuals, including the well-known rights lawyer Pu Zhiqiang, who […]
[…] – by profession scholars, journalists and writers – were detained in Beijing for holding a home seminar to mark the event. They had held similar seminars before but, in 2014, it was no longer tolerated. […]
[…] Pu with two crimes. In fact, the very thing that ultimately led to Pu Zhiqiang’s arrest was a gathering of a dozen or so people in a private home to hold a seminar on the 25th anniversary of June 4th in […]
[…] Pu with two crimes. In fact, the very thing that ultimately led to Pu Zhiqiang’s arrest was a gathering of a dozen or so people in a private home to hold a seminar on the 25th anniversary of June 4th in […]