By Bruce Lui, published December 4, 2015
The Chinese Communist Party marked the anniversary of its inaugural “National Constitution Day” on December 4 with more action than words: workers’ rights NGOs were raided and activists detained; the author of “A History of Brainwashing” was sentenced to nearly two years in prison; and a book on constitutionalism disappeared from stores. The People’s Daily frontpage, meanwhile, seemed to suggest China is now a one-man show… — The Editors
December 4, 2015, is China’s second National Constitution Day (國家憲法日)—a day that was announced with much fanfare for the first time last year. As of 5 p.m. Beijing time [as this article was written], there is not a single word about it on the homepage of Xinhua, which displays hundreds of other news items. Nor have the words “Constitution Day” appeared anywhere in the major internet portals like Netease, Tencent, or Sohu.
On the homepage of People’s Daily Online, three of its over one hundred headlines have to do with Constitution Day, but they were tucked under yesterday’s report on the third anniversary of the Eight Rules about Party discipline issued by the CCP.
That the state media gives a cold treatment to the first anniversary of Constitution Day is perhaps a reflection of the Chinese authorities: The constitution has not been honored anyway, and it’s better not to bring attention to it or make any pretenses. In any case, few know about it, and those who do know don’t take it seriously anyway.
Such a flippant attitude towards the constitution and the law speaks to the true character of the government, and the contrast between this year’s silence and last year’s outpouring of coverage is stark indeed.
In October 2014, the CCP Central Committee approved the Decision Concerning Several Major Issues In Comprehensively Advancing Governance According to Law, making December 4 China’s Constitution Day, to commemorate the constitution passed on December 4, 1982.
“The life of the constitution lies in its implementation,” Xi Jinping said. So Let’s take a look at how China is implementing its constitution.
Article 35 says “Citizens of the People’s Republic of China enjoy freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of procession and of demonstration.” Article 36 says “Citizens of the People’s Republic of China enjoy freedom of religious belief.” Article 37 says “Freedom of the person of citizens of the People’s Republic of China is inviolable.” Articles 38-41 promise to protect citizens’ dignity; prohibit unlawful search of, or intrusion into, a citizen’s residence; safeguard citizens’ freedom and privacy of correspondence; and prohibit retaliation against citizens who criticize the government and officials.
But in the past year or so, at least a few hundred human rights lawyers and their assistants have been arrested, confined to house arrest, disappeared, or prohibited from leaving the country; some had their homes raided and their communications intercepted. Publishers of banned books and their employees were disappeared in Thailand or China. The founder of a Hong Kong-based current affairs magazine was tried in mainland China. Liu Xiaobo couldn’t communicate with family members, and relatives have not been allowed monthly visits. Since Professor Ilham Tohti was sentenced to life in prison, his relatives have not been able to visit him on a regular basis. Lawyer Pu Zhiqiang, who was arrested for commemorating the 1989 democracy movement, has been detained beyond the legally prescribed terms, with his trial being postponed twice for a total six months.
In addition, to implement the constitution, there must be a constitutional review system that scrutinizes constitutional violations on the part of the government and those in power. But unfortunately, no progress has been made in this regard. As legal scholar Jiang Ping (江平) has pointed out, the biggest deficiency of the constitution is the absence of constitutional review, and that the courts in China cannot actually base their judgements on the constitution. When local governments violate the constitutional rights of citizens, citizens cannot hope that citing the constitution will help their complaints. Qiao Xiaoyang (乔晓阳), director of the Law Committee of the National People’s Congress, who has never studied law, wrote that China won’t have a constitutional supervision committee or a Constitutional Court—it will simply improve the constitutional supervision by the NPC Standing Committee.
When Chinese President Liu Shaoqi was assaulted by Red Guards in Zhongnanhai in August 1967, he held up a copy of China’s constitution to defend himself: “I’m the President of the People’s Republic of China! I’m a citizen!” But the constitution didn’t protect him, the second president of the People’s Republic of China, from a brutal death.
Let’s hope that such tragedy won’t happen again in China. If it does, I don’t think anyone will be holding up the constitution to protect themselves.
The silence on the National Constitution Day shows us how quickly things change in China, how memory evaporates, and what the constitution is really worth to the Chinese government.
Bruce Lui (呂秉權) is a senior lecturer in the Department of Journalism at Hong Kong Baptist University. Prior to his post there, he had a celebrated career reporting in China for over a decade with two major Hong Kong broadcasters, winning multiple awards for his reports on nuclear testing, human rights abuses, corruption, and more.
中文原文 《呂秉權：國家第二個憲法日就無了影》
[…] labor activists, including the heads of four labor advocacy NGOs, were arrested on December 3rd. Ironically, this was only one day before China’s Constitution Day, a holiday to promote rule of la… But here we see where law is turned into a weapon of the state—in defense of […]
[…] Such an appeal seems unlikely to sway it: official enthusiasm for the new Constitution Day holiday appeared muted this year compared with last, and the Party has long been clear about seeing that it does not view the law as […]
[…] Such an appeal seems unlikely to sway it: official enthusiasm for the new Constitution Day holiday appeared muted this year compared with last , and the Party has long been clear about seeing that it does not view the law […]